Hostages held by Hamas. An invasion of Gaza. A crush of refugees fleeing for safety. This conflict has a long history and must be understood in context.
![Israeli Palestinian conflict in context Israeli Palestinian conflict in context](png/israeli-palestinian-conflict-in-context.png)
Rockets are launched by Palestinian militants from the Gaza Strip towards Israel, in Gaza, Saturday, Oct. 7, 2023. (AP Photo/Hatem Moussa)
Over the years, News Decoder correspondents have tried to decode the events that occur between Israel, the Palestinian territories of Gaza and the West Bank and Israel’s complicated relationship with its Mideast neighbors.
What is happening now seems incomprehensible even for people who have long watched and studied developments in the region. The surprise attack on Israel by Hamas, the Sunni Islamist organization that has led Gaza since 2006, has killed more than 1,300 and injured another 3,227 people. Israeli retaliation has resulted in the deaths of more than 2,000 Palestinians and injuries to more than 9,000 others. Children on both sides have lost their lives. Hamas is holding some 200 hostages.
Less than one month ago, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had announced that the country was on the cusp of an historic peace treaty with long-time enemy Saudi Arabia. That followed on a 2020 peace deal with the United Arab Emirates.
To help you decode how we got from hope to despair, we compiled a range of articles from our correspondents about the Middle East conflict.
Decoding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
by 21 Aug 2015
|Palestinians and Israelis have been locked for decades in an intractable struggle. Its roots lie in history, religion and national identity. A lasting resolution has escaped many a statesman and yet would mark a major turning point in history.
Biden stirs worries among U.S. allies in Middle East
by Bernd Debusmann Jr | 28 Jan 2021
Under the presidential administration of Donald Trump, the United States knit close ties with both Israel and Saudi Arabia. After Joe Biden won the presidential election, the U.S. government began reassessing relations with the Middle East.
Israel-UAE deal gives Trump a chance to cry victory
by Bernd Debusmann Jr | 31 Aug 2020
During the presidential administration of Donald Trump, a peace deal between Israel and the United Arab Emirates seemed to be a result of Trump’s has transactional approach to foreign policy. But there was more to it than that.
Will COVID-19 hinder change in the Middle East?
by Bernd Debusmann Jr | 1 Apr 2020
Protesters across the Middle East had been hoping for a second Arab Spring — the series of protests in Arab Nations that began in Tunisia in 2010. The peoples of Algeria and Sudan had toppled their dictators and even in Israel, hundreds of thousands had taken to the street to protest the conservative policies of Netanyahu. But COVID-19 drove protestors off the streets.
I discovered a different Middle East in a desert and shop
by Jasmine Li | 21 Jun 2019
One News Decoder student associated the Middle East with violence, devastation and instability. But on a trip to Israel, she discovered hospitality and generosity among the people who live there.
Angels, demons, double standards in Trump’s Mideast
by Alistair Lyon | 14 May 2018
Faith is often flaunted in the Middle East but it isn’t always a uniter in the power politics of the region.
Trump and Israel: A chilling signal to Palestinians
By Alistair Lyon | 22 Dec 2016
Then-U.S. President Donald Trump picked as his ambassador to Israel a fervent sponsor of Israeli settlements on occupied Palestinian land and an enemy of any two-state solution to the nearly 70-year-old conflict. In doing so he threatened to destroy long-standing pillars of bipartisan U.S. policy concerning one of the world’s most intractable conflicts, in the midst of bloody upheavals across the Middle East.
Trump, a Middle East wild card
By Alistair Lyon | 24 Nov 2016
On the campaign trail, Donald Trump suggested steps that could plunge the Middle East further into chaos. Once President, would he change tack?
How has Europe failed in the Middle East?
by Hélène Pinto | 5 Aug 2016
The failed Israeli-Palestinian peace process is not an isolated case in the Middle East. Rather, it epitomizes the European Union’s struggle to promote peace and stability in the region.
Iran and Israel’s nuclear arsenal monopoly
by Bernd Debusmann | 3 Aug 2015
By far the loudest cries of alarm about the Iran nuclear agreement came from the only country in the region that has a nuclear arsenal — Israel.
Israel’s Netanyahu and a broken taboo
by Harvey Morris | 17 May 2015
The golden rule of Israeli politics had always been to avoid any public spat with the United States. The theory was that the electorate would punish any politician who endangered the country’s relationship with its closest and most powerful ally.
Three questions to consider:
- What makes peace in the Middle East so difficult to achieve?
- Why would Hamas and the Palestinians feel threatened by a peace agreement between Israel and Saudi Arabia?
- How do you think peace in the Middle East could be achieved?
These then are the threats to peace and security in the Middle East. These are the regimes, the terrorist leaders and their followers, the ones who answer the call for compromise and conciliation with the policies of confrontation and conquest.
The Middle East peace process is not an easy road — but then building peace is never easy. Israelis know this too well; more Israelis have been killed since the Oslo talks began than during the previous year. Israel’s partners know of the risks and dangers as well, facing the rhetoric of rejection and hate, and the threats of retaliation. Yet the participants in the peace process continue because they believe that what King Hussein called the “unnatural” state of hostility and fear which has dominated the Middle East for half a century must come to an end. Hostility and fear are the deadly allies of those who reject peace. They must go.
Yeah, the peace could be cultivated through listening to others’ advice and sit on conversation table because those countries had strong links considered to the last past but those who gave them fund to invest in war are hypocrite countries. The reason why UAS can involve in that war is not charity rather are the benefits which expect to fetch from those conflicted countries. Remember that Israel has high GDP and GNP and even the powered countries may do so for high interests. Let be attentive to receive the funds.